http://www.portal.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;$sessionid$HGZSRJVTOJMHPQF
IQMFSFFOAVCBQ0IV0?xml=/news/2003/07/10/ngm10.xml&sSheet=/portal/2003/07/10/i
xportal.html

DAILY TELEGRAPH

GM crops a waste of time, No 10 study will tell Blair

By Robert Uhlig, Farming Correspondent
(Filed: 10/07/2003)


The Prime Minister will be told tomorrow that there is no economic argument
to support commercial growing of genetically modified crops in Britain.

The conclusion of a Downing Street study, one of three government
investigations into GM crops and food, is a serious blow to Tony Blair and
Margaret Beckett, the Environment Secretary.

They have said that Britain needs to allow GM crops to be commercialised for
economic reasons.

But the report dismisses that argument and goes further, telling Mr Blair
that there is also no case for investing in GM crops to ensure Britain has a
lead in the development of GM pharmaceuticals - for example, plants modified
to produce antibiotics.

It even argues that there could be a "strong role for the UK to play" in
providing non-GM foods, a recommendation that will be seized upon by the
organic lobby as further justification for its call to ban GM crops so that
organic crops are not contaminated.

With a science review due to report imminently and the GM public debate,
which started last month, the economic assessment is part of the
Government's investigation into the viability of GM crops.

It has considered the likely economic outcome of various scenarios,
including full or partial commercialisation of GM crops and an outright ban
on their cultivation.

The report comes as the president of Canada's National Farmers Union arrived
in Britain to warn British farmers that GM crops, in Canada and elsewhere,
have failed to live up to their promises of increased yields and reduced
costs.

Stewart Wells said: "UK farmers should not be fooled."

Lyle Wright, a Canadian NFU member who accompanied him, said: "The promises
come first and only later come the realities of contamination and genetic
pollution, higher seed costs, market loss and superweeds."