World not ready for GM wheat - conference AUSTRALIA: April 18, 2002 MELBOURNE - The world market was not ready for genetically modified (GM) wheat, which occupied a special category in the world food chain, industry leaders told the Grains Week conference yesterday. Millers and bakers would not deal with GM wheat, while stores would not put GM wheat or noodles on their shelves amid current public concern, Alan Tracy, president of U.S. Wheat Associates, said. "Should we grow a product that won't sell?" he asked. "The market is not ready for GM wheat at this time." Asked why the United States was not producing GM wheat when it had moved strongly into production of other GM crops including soybeans, Tracy said wheat was the world's most sensitive agricultural product. "Wheat is mentioned in the Lord's Prayer, other commodities are not," he said. Complete separability of conventionally produced wheat from GM wheat could not be guaranteed. This would leave the conventional product vulnerable on world markets, he said. Tracy pointed to disruptions already caused in international trade by GM corn which had entered markets for conventional corn. The international wheat industry had to work realistically on the challenges posed by genetic modification, he said. U.S. life science group Monsanto Co. was ready to launch "Roundup Ready" GM wheat in 2005. Australian scientists were also conducting research into GM wheat, concentrating on gluten content and on drought resistance, he said. Allan McKinnon, special negotiator for agriculture in the Office of Negotiations in Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, told the conference that previous public hysteria against GM foods was beginning to swing back more toward acceptance of modified foods. But public concern had produced some of the most stringent labelling laws in the world in Australia on GM food. WTO GM PROTOCOL ATTACKED Present laws in the World Trade Organisation (WTO) were adequate to deal with GM trade, he said, adding his voice to a chorus of opposition at the conference over the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. The protocol, put forward by European nations, aims to protect the environment from uncontrolled release of GM organisms by imposing controls on trade. The protocol was attacked by many speakers at the conference for its potential to create trade barriers which could be justified under a "precautionary principle". Alan Oxley, managing consultant at International Trade Strategies Pty Ltd and a former Australian career diplomat and trade negotiator, said the protocol would give the European Union unrestrained power to block imports of any GM product in the future. However, he also said that in 10 to 20 years' time, a GM variant of every major commodity would exist. REUTERS NEWS SERVICE